[ad_1]
DMK, the ruling celebration of Tamil Nadu, has raised a secessionist demand if the state will not be given autonomy. Celebration MP A Raja, within the presence of DMK president and Tamil Nadu chief minister MK Stalin, in actual fact, warned the Centre to provide Tamil Nadu extra rights or else the following stage can be a battle for separate nationhood.
As per PTI, Raja stated, “I’m telling Amit Shah and the Prime Minister with utmost humility, I implore you within the presence of (our) leaders on the dais, our chief minister is journeying on the trail of Anna (CN Annadurai, former CM and DMK founder), don’t push us on the trail of Periyar. Don’t make us search a separate nation. Give state autonomy and we is not going to relaxation until then.”
In keeping with Raja, the DMK had thus far stored apart the demand for a separate nation, as envisioned by Erode Venkatappa Ramasamy, popularly often known as Periyar, the daddy of the Dravidian motion, however the celebration’s persistence is now working out.
The reality although is that the demand for a separate Tamil nation was dumped lengthy again, each by Periyar and Anna.
Dravidian duo
The Dravidian motion in Tamil Nadu was pushed by Periyar and Anna. They opposed the imposition of Hindi, have been towards the affect of Brahmins within the society, and needed a separate nation for the area talking Dravidian languages, calling it Dravida Nadu.
The demand began with the anti-Hindi agitation in Tamil Nadu in 1938. The Forties and Fifties noticed its peak. Periyar was demanding Dravidasthan or Dravida Nadu. He needed a separate nation throughout southern India. His demand continued until 1956 when as per the State Reorganisation Act, states have been divided based mostly on linguistic strains. Demanding a separate nation turned meaningless for Periyar after it. As an alternative, he now centered extra on Tamil rights and the Tamil Nadu Thamizharukke (Tamil Nadu is just for Tamils) demand.
However his lieutenant, Anna, who after variations with him later fashioned a distinct celebration, refused to budge. He was nonetheless persistently voicing calls for for a separate nation and used to talk on it even within the Indian Parliament.
Anna stated this within the Rajya Sabha in 1962: “I declare, Sir, to come back from a rustic, a component in India now, however which I feel is of a distinct inventory, not essentially antagonistic. I belong to the Dravidian inventory. I’m proud to name myself a Dravidian. That doesn’t imply that I’m towards a Bengali or a Maharashtrian or a Gujarati. As Robert Burns has said, ‘A person is a person for all that’. I say that I belong to the Dravidian inventory and that’s solely as a result of I think about that the Dravidians have gotten one thing concrete, one thing distinct, one thing completely different to supply to the nation at massive. Due to this fact it’s that we would like self-determination.”
Politicians of Tamil Nadu weren’t alone in elevating this demand for a separate nation. Secessionist calls have been additionally being raised from Punjab and Nagaland. It was an actual risk that in future, native and regional leaders from many different states as nicely, based mostly on their cultural and linguistic variations, might make comparable calls for.
To manage such secessionist threats, by means of the sixteenth Modification, the phrases “the sovereignty and integrity of India” have been added to Article 19(2) of the Structure. After this modification, elevating such secessionist threats turned unconstitutional and unlawful.
Article 19 of the Indian Structure ensures freedom of speech and expression however to curb such secessionist threats, a restriction was added by means of the sixteenth modification, as inserted in Article 19 (2), “Nothing…..shall have an effect on the operation of any current legislation, or forestall the State from making any legislation, in as far as such legislation imposes cheap restrictions on the train of the proper conferred…..Within the pursuits of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the safety of the State, pleasant relations with overseas States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court docket, defamation or incitement to an offence.”
The sixteenth modification, additionally referred to as the anti-secession invoice, banned secessionist advocacy and was a transparent warning to secessionists like Anna who needed to droop the demand for a separate nation. Tamil Nadu’s separatist motion, in actual fact, was a root trigger. Sure political sections within the state needed to make use of the electoral course of to demand a separate nation from India within the title of individuals’s opinion, one thing that was utilized by the Muslim League in colonial India to demand the partition of the nation.
After the sixteenth modification, Anna had no possibility however to depart his demand for a separate nation as persevering with it and following it by means of protests and different political motion meant it could be an criminality that might, in flip, have compromised his political profession. He stated this whereas placing an finish to his secessionist name: “I’ve given up the Dravida Nadu demand. However not even one of many causes for searching for Dravida Nadu.”
Authorized implications
A Raja’s remark appears political in nature. The NDA guidelines the nation and the states dominated by the non-NDA events routinely complain that the Centre discriminates towards them. Raja’s assertion displays extra of a Centre-states battle, aligning with the DMK’s focus, “autonomy of the states with federal construction at Centre” that it has adopted since 1970.
Additionally, as defined by the Supreme Courtroom of India and lots of authorized specialists, calling for “freedom of a state/UT” verbally will not be against the law till it’s adopted by violence and associated motion on the bottom.
Learn all of the Newest Information, Breaking Information, watch Prime Movies and Reside TV right here.
[ad_2]
Source link
