[ad_1]
The court-appointed workforce, which carried out the survey on the Shringar Gauri temple-Gyanvapi mosque advanced, will submit the report earlier than a Varanasi court docket on Tuesday because the listening to will resume.
After listening to inconclusive arguments from the 2 sides, Varanasi’s Civil Decide (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwakar listed the matter for additional listening to on Tuesday. Decide Diwakar had ordered the survey earlier on a plea by 5 Delghi ladies looking for the court docket’s permission to carry out each day worships of idols of some deities situated on the western wall of the mosque.
In the meantime, the mesmerizing Taj Mahal – India’s solely ever monument that was chosen as one of many seven Wonders of the World – is in the course of Hindu non secular scrutiny after a petition was filed earlier than the Allahabad Excessive Courtroom to open 20 rooms inside it to search out if “Hindu idols and inscriptions are hidden there.”
Right here’s a wrap up of each the controversies
Shringar Gauri temple-Gyanvapi mosque
In 1991, a bunch of petitions have been filed in Varanasi district court docket by native monks looking for permission to worship within the Gyanvapi advanced. The petitioners claimed that the Gyanvapi Masjid was constructed on the orders of Mughal ruler Aurangzeb by demolishing part of the Kashi Vishwanath Mandir within the seventeenth century.
Minimize to 2019, petitioners demanded that an archaeological survey of the whole Gyanvapi mosque advanced must be carried out.
Two years later, in September 2021, the Allahabad Excessive Courtroom stayed the archaeological survey of ASI in Gyanvapi Masjid.
Within the newest row, 5 Delhi-based ladies — Rakhi Singh, Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu and others moved the court docket with their plea on April 18, 2021 demanding that opponents cease “inflicting any injury to the idols” and proper to worship the idols of Shringar Gauri and different deities within the mosque premises each day should be secured.
On Monday, the mosque administration committee, represented by advocate Abhay Nath Yadav, has approached the court docket for the appointment of one other advocate because the court docket commissioner, accusing the current certainly one of favouring Hindu petitioners in his court-mandated process. Courtroom commissioner Mishra and legal professionals representing each the Hindu and Muslim sides had on Saturday gone contained in the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri temple advanced.
Regardless of spending practically two hours contained in the advanced, that they had not been in a position to accomplish the work and needed to come out of the advanced. Counsel Vishnu Jain, representing the 5 Delhi ladies, too had gone contained in the advanced with Mishra on Saturday.
After rising from there, he had informed reporters that males current contained in the mosque didn’t permit the survey workforce to enter the mosque space to do the survey. He had additionally accused the district administration of not serving to the court docket commissioner’s workforce in coming into the mosque. Jain had stated they’d apprise the court docket on Monday of the opposition to the court-mandated process of the mosque advanced and search a selected order to hold out the videography and survey of the Gyanvapi mosque.
The videographic survey of the mosque was ordered earlier by Decide Diwakar on a plea by Delhi ladies Rakhi Singh, Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu and others looking for permission to carry out each day worship of deities Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Lord Hanuman and Nandi whose idols are situated on the outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque. They’d moved the court docket with their plea on April 18, 2021, and had additionally sought the court docket’s order to cease the opponents from inflicting any injury to the idols.
The counsel for the mosque administration committee (Anjuman Intezamiya Masajid), Yadav had earlier contended that the court docket had not given any order to do the videography contained in the mosque however to do it solely until the ‘chabutra’ (courtyard) outdoors the barricades enclosing the mosque space. The court docket commissioner had on Friday carried out an inclonclusive survey of some areas outdoors Gyanvapi Masjid within the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri advanced amid temporary sloganeering by two sides.
4 Petitioners Reject Report They Plan to Withdraw Plea
4 of the 5 petitioners within the Gyanvapi mosque-Shringar Gauri temple case Sunday dismissed studies that they plan to withdraw the plea. The 4 ladies — Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas, Rekha Pathak and Laxmi Devi informed a press convention right here they may battle the case until the top.
This comes after chief of Vishwa Vaidik Sanatan Sangh Jitendra Singh Bisen stated his NGO, which backed the unique plea filed by the 5 ladies, has now sought the withdrawal of the petition that demanded permission for each day worship and performing Hindu rituals at Shringar Gauri temple, One of many 4 ladies petitioners informed the presser, “If any sort of resolution (relating to the withdrawal of the case) is taken, we’re in opposition to it. We’ll battle the case to the final breath. We’ll proceed our battle for our Gods and Goddesses. Nonetheless, the fifth petitioner within the case Rakhi Singh was not current on the press convention.
Rekha Pathak stated, “A few days in the past, I had spoken to Rakhi Singh, however there was no dialogue relating to withdrawal of the case.” When contacted, Jitendra Singh Bisen refused to touch upon the matter. The petitioners have sought the permission to carry out each day worship of deities Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Lord Hanuman and Nandi whose idols are on the outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque.
Courtroom Staff Visits Gyanvapi Mosque-Shringar Gauri Temple Advanced, Fails to Do Survey
A court docket commissioner’s workforce on Saturday visited the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri temple advanced right here and stayed there for over two hours however did not conduct a videographic-survey of the mosque resulting from protest by Muslim males. The Muslims protested in opposition to the survey even because the mosque administration committee moved a Varanasi district court docket looking for the appointment of a distinct court docket commissioner, apart from the current one, Ajay Kumar Mishra.
After listening to the plea this morning to vary the court docket commissioner, Varanasi’s Civil Decide (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwakar reserved his order for Could 9. Courtroom-appointed commissioner Mishra together with legal professionals representing each the Hindu and Muslim sides went contained in the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri temple advanced. However, after spending practically two hours contained in the advanced, they got here out with out conducting the duty.
Vishnu Jain, a lawyer from the Hindu aspect who had gone contained in the advanced with the surveyor informed reporters that Muslim males current within the mosque didn’t permit the workforce to enter the mosque space for its videography and survey as per the court docket’s order. He alleged that the district administration didn’t assist both the survey workforce do its job.
Jain stated they’d inform the court docket on Could 9 concerning the matter and would ask for particular order to hold out the videography and survey of the Gyanvapi mosque. Police earlier held a Muslim man elevating non secular slogans when the survey workforce was coming into the mosque-temple advanced and whisked him to a police station.
The videography and survey train is being carried out on the identical court docket’s earlier order on a plea by Delhi-based ladies Rakhi Singh, Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu and others looking for permission for performing each day worship of deities Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Lord Hanuman and Nandi situated whose idols are situated on the outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque. They’d moved the court docket with their plea on April 18, 2021 and had sought to cease the opponents from inflicting any injury to the idols.
The counsel for the mosque administration committee (Anjuman Intezamiya Masajid), Abhay Nath Yadav informed reporters that the court docket had not given any order to do the videography contained in the mosque however to do it until the ‘chabutra’ (courtyard) outdoors the barricading. Yadav stated, “The videography and survey began at round 4.00 pm Yesterday and the videography was carried out until the ‘chabutra’ on the western aspect of the mosque. “After that, when the commissioner made an effort to go contained in the mosque by getting its entrance door opened, I opposed it, declaring that the court docket has not given any such order below which videography may be carried out contained in the mosque,” he stated.
“The court-appointed commissioner claimed he has the orders to open the locks and get videography carried out. However, the reality is that there is no such thing as a such order like this, therefore I raised questions on the impartiality of the court docket commissioner,” Yadav stated. Litigant buddies of the Hindu aspect Vijay Shankar Rastogi stated, “The court docket whereas listening to the plea looking for to vary the court docket commissioner, has reserved its order.” “The court-appointed commissioner is discharging his accountability with honesty. An utility was moved on behalf of the Anjuman Intezamiya Masajid Committee to create hurdles for him, accusing him of colluding with petitioners,” he added.
Rastogi additionally stated the survey will happen because the court docket has not put any type of ban on it. The court docket commissioner had on Friday carried out a videographic survey of some areas outdoors Gyanvapi Masjid within the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri advanced.
Petition in Allahabad HC to open 20 rooms in Taj Mahal
A petition has been filed within the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad excessive court docket looking for directives to the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to open 20 rooms contained in the Taj Mahal in Agra to determine whether or not the Hindu idols and inscriptions are hidden there.
Bharatiya Janata Celebration (BJP) media in-charge of Ayodhya district, Dr Rajneesh Singh has filed the petition which is but to come back up for listening to.
Advocate Rudra Vikram Singh is representing the petitioner in court docket.
“There may be an previous controversy associated to the Taj Mahal. Round 20 rooms in Taj Mahal are locked and nobody is allowed to enter. It’s believed that in these rooms there are idols of Hindu gods and scriptures,” stated Dr Rajneesh Singh.
“I’ve filed a petition within the excessive court docket looking for directives to ASI to open these rooms to determine info. There isn’t a hurt in opening these rooms and setting to relaxation all controversies,” stated Singh on Sunday.
Within the plea, the petitioner has sought directives from the court docket to the state authorities to represent a committee that will study these rooms and search for any proof associated with the Hindu idols or scriptures there.
Rajneesh Singh stated he has been attempting to determine info concerning the 20 locked rooms of Taj Mahal since 2020 by way of the Proper to Data Act (RTI).
Singh had filed an RTI in 2020 with the Union ministry of Tradition looking for details about the rooms.
“Since 2020, I’ve been attempting to determine info concerning the locked rooms of Taj Mahal. I had filed an RTI. Replying to the RTI, the Union ministry of Tradition knowledgeable the Central Data Fee (in Delhi) that these rooms have been locked resulting from safety causes and no element was supplied about these rooms,” he added.
“Within the RTI, I had sought particulars concerning the locked rooms (what’s inside them) and directives to open them,” Singh stated.
“When all my efforts failed then I’ve approached the Lucknow excessive court docket looking for directives to the federal government to open these rooms and represent a fact-finding committee to search out out whether or not Hindu gods and scriptures are inside them,” he added.
It might be identified that a number of right-wing organisations declare Taj Mahal to be Tejo Mahalaya, a Hindu temple.
ASI Rubbished RW Claims on Taj Mahal Time and Once more with Proof
In 2015, six legal professionals filed instances claiming that the Taj Mahal was initially a Shiva shrine. In 2017, BJP chief Vinay Katiyar repeated the declare and requested UP CM Yogi Adityanath to journey to the monument to take a look at the Hindu sings inside. In January 2019, BJP chief Anant Kumar Hegde additionally claimed that Taj Mahal was not constructed by Shah Jahan however fairly purchased by him from King Jayasimha.
Such claims have been put to relaxation not simply by historians but additionally by the Archeological Survey of India which has again and again refuted such revisionist interpretations of Taj Mahal’s historical past and dismissed claims to possession.
In February 2018, the ASI filed an affidavit in an Agra court docket, stating that the Taj Mahal was certainly constructed as a tomb by the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan who supposed it to be a tomb and shrine for his Mumtaz Mahal.
(With company inputs)
Learn all of the Newest Information , Breaking Information and IPL 2022 Stay Updates right here.
[ad_2]
Source link
