[ad_1]
BENGALURU/JALANDHAR: Amid the fierce debate over permitting hijab in faculties in Karnataka, a 17-year-old Amritdhari (baptised) Sikh lady was requested by her faculty to take away her turban as the faculty has a uniform costume code and it has to comply with the February 10 interim order of the Karnataka excessive courtroom restraining college students from “sporting saffron shawls, hijab and spiritual flags or the like in lecture rooms of faculties which have prescribed a uniform”.
The lady’s household, whereas insisting that the faculty by no means discriminated and has at all times been very thoughtful and well mannered, mentioned the Karnataka authorities and the excessive courtroom must make clear on the matter and problem directions.
The coed of Mount Carmel PU Faculty, Bengaluru, who can be the president of the scholars’ affiliation, was politely requested to take away her turban for the primary time on February 16 to which she refused. The school later spoke to her father stating they understood the significance of the turban for a Sikh however have been certain by the excessive courtroom order.
“We’ve got had no points with the lady sporting the turban thus far. When the faculty reopened on February 16, we knowledgeable all college students concerning the excessive courtroom order and we went on with our regular actions. On Tuesday, when deputy director of pre-university schooling (north) visited the faculty, he discovered a bunch of women in hijab and advised them to come back to the workplace and advised them concerning the excessive courtroom order. These women have been demanding now that no women needs to be allowed to put on their spiritual symbols and subsequently the Sikh lady additionally shouldn’t be allowed to put on the turban. We spoke to the lady’s father and later mailed him. We knowledgeable them concerning the order and advised them to abide by it. The daddy responded that it (the turban) is an integral a part of their life. We didn’t need to intervene, however the different women have been insisting on uniformity and therefore we despatched the mail,” a Mount Carmel PU Faculty spokesperson mentioned.
“We by no means despatched them out or are forcing anyone, we’re simply telling them that we’d like uniformity within the 4 partitions of the lecture rooms as per the HC order. In our letter to the daddy, now we have particularly talked about that we imagine in an inclusive society and respect all spiritual practices. Based on the imaginative and prescient and mission of the faculty, we comply with inter-religious concord and have an lively inter-religious affiliation,” the faculty mentioned.
Requested concerning the problem, deputy director of pre-university schooling (north) G Sriram mentioned: “The HC order doesn’t say something about turbans. We shouldn’t be dragging in additional points now. We’ve got to solely comply with the excessive courtroom order. Once I requested the principal, she mentioned the women are satisfied and there aren’t any points within the faculty now.”
The lady’s father, Gurcharan Singh, who works at a senior stage in a significant IT firm and has been residing in Karnataka for the previous 17 years, mentioned he advised the faculty authorities she wouldn’t take away her turban.
“She has by no means confronted any discrimination within the faculty until now. Now additionally they appear to be caught in a piquant state of affairs whereas responding to the excessive courtroom order,” he advised TOI.
He wrote to the faculty that the excessive courtroom order didn’t point out something about ‘Sikh turban’ and it shouldn’t be misunderstood. “Nonetheless, I’m additionally in contact with our neighborhood advocates and numerous organisations,” he mentioned, urging the authorities to permit his daughter along with her turban to attend courses. After the newest interplay with faculty authorities, Gurcharan Singh has approached senior advocate HS Phoolka and sought his opinion.
“I’m sending my opinion to him that neither the HC order nor the federal government order bars Sikh turban,” mentioned Phoolka, when contacted by TOI on Wednesday night.
Gurcharan Singh has apprised Jeetendra Singh, administrator of Sri Guru Singh Sabha, Ulsoor, Bengaluru, concerning the problem.
“Asking a Sikh to take away his/her turban is a giant insult to a Sikh and the complete Sikh neighborhood. We additionally stand by these Muslim women/girls who need to cowl their head with scarf/dupatta as part of their religion and request authorities to permit them to take action because it was already practised in our nation and it doesn’t trigger any hassle to different individuals. The color of the headscarf and dastaar (turban) can match the uniform of the establishment,” he wrote.
The lady’s household, whereas insisting that the faculty by no means discriminated and has at all times been very thoughtful and well mannered, mentioned the Karnataka authorities and the excessive courtroom must make clear on the matter and problem directions.
The coed of Mount Carmel PU Faculty, Bengaluru, who can be the president of the scholars’ affiliation, was politely requested to take away her turban for the primary time on February 16 to which she refused. The school later spoke to her father stating they understood the significance of the turban for a Sikh however have been certain by the excessive courtroom order.
“We’ve got had no points with the lady sporting the turban thus far. When the faculty reopened on February 16, we knowledgeable all college students concerning the excessive courtroom order and we went on with our regular actions. On Tuesday, when deputy director of pre-university schooling (north) visited the faculty, he discovered a bunch of women in hijab and advised them to come back to the workplace and advised them concerning the excessive courtroom order. These women have been demanding now that no women needs to be allowed to put on their spiritual symbols and subsequently the Sikh lady additionally shouldn’t be allowed to put on the turban. We spoke to the lady’s father and later mailed him. We knowledgeable them concerning the order and advised them to abide by it. The daddy responded that it (the turban) is an integral a part of their life. We didn’t need to intervene, however the different women have been insisting on uniformity and therefore we despatched the mail,” a Mount Carmel PU Faculty spokesperson mentioned.
“We by no means despatched them out or are forcing anyone, we’re simply telling them that we’d like uniformity within the 4 partitions of the lecture rooms as per the HC order. In our letter to the daddy, now we have particularly talked about that we imagine in an inclusive society and respect all spiritual practices. Based on the imaginative and prescient and mission of the faculty, we comply with inter-religious concord and have an lively inter-religious affiliation,” the faculty mentioned.
Requested concerning the problem, deputy director of pre-university schooling (north) G Sriram mentioned: “The HC order doesn’t say something about turbans. We shouldn’t be dragging in additional points now. We’ve got to solely comply with the excessive courtroom order. Once I requested the principal, she mentioned the women are satisfied and there aren’t any points within the faculty now.”
The lady’s father, Gurcharan Singh, who works at a senior stage in a significant IT firm and has been residing in Karnataka for the previous 17 years, mentioned he advised the faculty authorities she wouldn’t take away her turban.
“She has by no means confronted any discrimination within the faculty until now. Now additionally they appear to be caught in a piquant state of affairs whereas responding to the excessive courtroom order,” he advised TOI.
He wrote to the faculty that the excessive courtroom order didn’t point out something about ‘Sikh turban’ and it shouldn’t be misunderstood. “Nonetheless, I’m additionally in contact with our neighborhood advocates and numerous organisations,” he mentioned, urging the authorities to permit his daughter along with her turban to attend courses. After the newest interplay with faculty authorities, Gurcharan Singh has approached senior advocate HS Phoolka and sought his opinion.
“I’m sending my opinion to him that neither the HC order nor the federal government order bars Sikh turban,” mentioned Phoolka, when contacted by TOI on Wednesday night.
Gurcharan Singh has apprised Jeetendra Singh, administrator of Sri Guru Singh Sabha, Ulsoor, Bengaluru, concerning the problem.
“Asking a Sikh to take away his/her turban is a giant insult to a Sikh and the complete Sikh neighborhood. We additionally stand by these Muslim women/girls who need to cowl their head with scarf/dupatta as part of their religion and request authorities to permit them to take action because it was already practised in our nation and it doesn’t trigger any hassle to different individuals. The color of the headscarf and dastaar (turban) can match the uniform of the establishment,” he wrote.
[ad_2]
Source link
ADVERTISEMENT
