[ad_1]
BAREILY: A British passport holder — who arrived in India on November 24 — examined constructive for Covid however managed to fly overseas on December 4 after securing a adverse report from a Bareilly non-public lab.
SSP Rohit Singh Sajwan mentioned: “We are going to take motion as soon as a criticism is lodged by the well being division.”
The primary pattern of the person, who was born in Bareilly and works within the UK, was collected on December 3 and the report arrived the identical night time. Nonetheless, in line with the second lab’s data, the RT-PCR was collected at 9am on December 4 and the report was out by 11am. He then left for Delhi and boarded the flight at 4pm. Bareilly well being division has ordered a probe in opposition to the second lab.
On December 6, his swab collected by the primary lab was despatched to Lucknow for additional probe and the report got here out constructive. Dr Anurag Gautam, nodal officer for Covid in Bareilly, instructed TOI, “The Lucknow lab confirmed that the person was contaminated with the Delta variant. We’re verifying the credibility of the second report …”
TOI contacted each the labs however they refused to remark.
SSP Rohit Singh Sajwan mentioned: “We are going to take motion as soon as a criticism is lodged by the well being division.”
The primary pattern of the person, who was born in Bareilly and works within the UK, was collected on December 3 and the report arrived the identical night time. Nonetheless, in line with the second lab’s data, the RT-PCR was collected at 9am on December 4 and the report was out by 11am. He then left for Delhi and boarded the flight at 4pm. Bareilly well being division has ordered a probe in opposition to the second lab.
On December 6, his swab collected by the primary lab was despatched to Lucknow for additional probe and the report got here out constructive. Dr Anurag Gautam, nodal officer for Covid in Bareilly, instructed TOI, “The Lucknow lab confirmed that the person was contaminated with the Delta variant. We’re verifying the credibility of the second report …”
TOI contacted each the labs however they refused to remark.
[ad_2]
Source link